Dear Andrew, It is OK I will explain what I meant. ‘Cherries picture’… One of the cherries is round, ripe, nourishing and real, made by nature… cannot be reproduced by man, (man needs nature’s collaboration to do that) The other cherry is square, man made and can be reproduced…feels good to consume… Actually both feel good to consume if you like them, but one of them carries essential vitamins minerals and energy for life. ‘Square peg and round hole synonym’. The cherries are connected and represent one entity somehow. Clip… The film is about a materialistic society in the 1960’s when education even on the highest level at Oxford was dictating intelligent individuals how to think (not teaching them to think for themselves, look within and find their own way of contributing)
The other option represented in the film is indulging in short-lived happiness and fun for whatever price individuals would have to pay for them. So the question is: Is it different now? After all these years do we know better? One of the ways produced a man, who follows instructions how to think. The other way produced a man to cheat and trick people to get short-lived satisfaction. Both produced a man with dead emptiness within. The outer is meaningless without the inner richness. And the outer richness only makes the inner poverty prominent. Judit
The truth is that there are multiple levels of activity behind what appears to be a play of incredible magnitude. Would you be surprised to learn that you are writing the lines and until you can figure out a point to the script, there is none? The search for answers to this question intrigues the mind. Cooperation is a natural phenomenon as long as the need to control is absent. The need to control is a learned activity that becomes habitual through the experience of it. If you accept responsibility by making a personal commitment between you and the creative energy that focused you through thought into this existence you may enjoy taking yourself to the edge of extinction for the fun of the adventure…Purity of response to this outweighs educational degrees. Those who know the least of what is going on will hear first. If you are serious in attempting to understand this then if you dare, look at the events that you have already experienced and you will see that this has been the case many times. Now you must decide whether to take back your power, remove the blindfold of your own volition or wait until it’s removed for you. Where do you stand at this pivotal point? You must ask yourself and you must answer yourself! ( Copy of text which I first posted on my previous blog Sourcesense ll, on 1st July 2009.)
How did it feel like working at the Petö Institute at the beginning of the 1980's?
'It felt like the smell of freshly cut grass infused with a particular ray of sunshine that carried the light of simplicity, reassurance, calmness and clarity. It felt like a clear sense of focus and determination merged with the gentle breeze of everyday life with its noises, textures and feelings. Bringing this magical combination of peace (a kind of knowing), clarity and compassion into our distinctively perceivable three-dimensional world of time and space reality. It felt like purpose with infinite bounds of possibilities and choices, combined with a sense of seriousness and awe-inspiring joyful responsibility'. J Szathmáry
2 comments:
Sorry, I just don't get it
It looks to me not so much education as self-indulgence.
As ever, seeking enlightenment,
Andrew.
Dear Andrew,
It is OK I will explain what I meant.
‘Cherries picture’…
One of the cherries is round, ripe, nourishing and real, made by nature… cannot be reproduced by man, (man needs nature’s collaboration to do that)
The other cherry is square, man made and can be reproduced…feels good to consume…
Actually both feel good to consume if you like them, but one of them carries essential vitamins minerals and energy for life.
‘Square peg and round hole synonym’.
The cherries are connected and represent one entity somehow.
Clip…
The film is about a materialistic society in the 1960’s when education even on the highest level at Oxford was dictating intelligent individuals how to think (not teaching them to think for themselves, look within and find their own way of contributing)
The other option represented in the film is indulging in short-lived happiness and fun for whatever price individuals would have to pay for them.
So the question is: Is it different now?
After all these years do we know better?
One of the ways produced a man, who follows instructions how to think.
The other way produced a man to cheat and trick people to get short-lived satisfaction.
Both produced a man with dead emptiness within.
The outer is meaningless without the inner richness.
And the outer richness only makes the inner poverty prominent.
Judit
Post a Comment